<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>quelquefois &#187; East vs. West</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quelquefois.net/toujours/tag/east-vs-west/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quelquefois.net/toujours</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Epic Battle: East Versus West</title>
		<link>http://quelquefois.net/toujours/2008/12/27/epic-battle-east-versus-west/</link>
		<comments>http://quelquefois.net/toujours/2008/12/27/epic-battle-east-versus-west/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 04:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East vs. West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quelquefois.net/toujours/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the central government blocked access to the New York Times. Then a few days later, unblocked access. No one really knows why, but personally I think it has something to do with negative coverage of China on the website. Right after access is restored, the Times publishes an article about releasing a political dissident in China. The site hasn&#8217;t been blocked again, but I thought it was ironic that: a. the Times posts a politically sensitive article after it was blocked for political reasons b. the indirectly anti-China article was surrounded by a pro-China advertisement:   According to the Shanghaiist, these ads are paid for by the Chinese government to spread their interpretation of Tibetan history and development.  I wonder how East-West tensions will escalate (or ease) as a new President transitions into power, as the financial crisis continues, and as China transitions into post-Olympics 2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the central government blocked access to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/world/asia/20china.html">New York Times</a>. Then a few days later, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/world/asia/23china.html">unblocked access</a>. No one really knows why, but personally I think it has something to do with negative coverage of China on the website. Right after access is restored, the Times publishes an article about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/24/world/asia/24china.html">releasing a political dissident</a> in China. The site hasn&#8217;t been blocked again, but I thought it was ironic that:</p>
<p>a. the Times posts a politically sensitive article after it was blocked for political reasons<br />
b. the indirectly anti-China article was surrounded by a pro-China advertisement:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-281" title="NYTimes Article" src="http://quelquefois.net/toujours/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2.png" alt="" width="500" height="222" /> <br />
According to the <a href="http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/20/google-ads-tibet.php">Shanghaiist</a>, these ads are paid for by the Chinese government to spread their interpretation of Tibetan history and development. </p>
<p>I wonder how East-West tensions will escalate (or ease) as a new President transitions into power, as the financial crisis continues, and as China transitions into post-Olympics 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quelquefois.net/toujours/2008/12/27/epic-battle-east-versus-west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

